\begin{table}[ht]
\centering
\resizebox{.85\textwidth}{!}{
\begin{tabular}{lrrrrr}
  \hline
Outcome & Estimate & SE & t & p-value & 95\% CI \\ 
  \hline
\multicolumn{6}{c}{I. Monitoring vs. Control} \\ 
  \underline{A. White vs. Black} &  &  &  &  &  \\ 
  Index measure of favorable in-person interactions  & -0.015 & 0.052 & -0.285 & (0.388) & [-0.117, 0.087] \\ 
  Received post-visit callback  & -0.002 & 0.045 & -0.035 & (0.486) & [-0.091, 0.088] \\ 
  Received post-visit offer for unit  & -0.003 & 0.036 & -0.091 & (0.464) & [-0.075, 0.068] \\ 
  \underline{B. White vs. Hispanic} &  &  &  &  &  \\ 
  Index measure of favorable in-person interactions  & -0.061 & 0.057 & -1.079 & (0.141) & [-0.172, 0.05] \\ 
  Received post-visit callback  & -0.036 & 0.043 & -0.837 & (0.201) & [-0.121, 0.049] \\ 
  Received post-visit offer for unit  & -0.017 & 0.034 & -0.496 & (0.31) & [-0.084, 0.05] \\ 
  \underline{C. Black vs. Hispanic} &  &  &  &  &  \\ 
  Index measure of favorable in-person interactions  & -0.089 & 0.052 & -1.7 & (0.09) & [-0.192, 0.014] \\ 
  Received post-visit callback  & -0.035 & 0.042 & -0.822 & (0.412) & [-0.118, 0.048] \\ 
  Received post-visit offer for unit  & -0.014 & 0.031 & -0.444 & (0.657) & [-0.074, 0.047] \\ 
  \hline \multicolumn{6}{c}{II. Punitive vs. Control} \\ 
  \underline{A. White vs. Black} &  &  &  &  &  \\ 
  Index measure of favorable in-person interactions  & 0.007 & 0.053 & 0.139 & (0.555) & [-0.097, 0.112] \\ 
  Received post-visit callback  & 0.019 & 0.042 & 0.456 & (0.676) & [-0.064, 0.103] \\ 
  Received post-visit offer for unit  & 0.018 & 0.035 & 0.515 & (0.697) & [-0.051, 0.087] \\ 
  \underline{B. White vs. Hispanic} &  &  &  &  &  \\ 
  Index measure of favorable in-person interactions  & 0.048 & 0.055 & 0.863 & (0.806) & [-0.061, 0.157] \\ 
  Received post-visit callback  & -0.066 & 0.041 & -1.596 & (0.056) & [-0.147, 0.015] \\ 
  Received post-visit offer for unit  & -0.021 & 0.034 & -0.618 & (0.268) & [-0.089, 0.046] \\ 
  \underline{C. Black vs. Hispanic} &  &  &  &  &  \\ 
  Index measure of favorable in-person interactions  & 0.039 & 0.049 & 0.791 & (0.429) & [-0.057, 0.134] \\ 
  Received post-visit callback  & -0.085 & 0.041 & -2.097 & (0.037) & [-0.165, -0.005] \\ 
  Received post-visit offer for unit  & -0.039 & 0.033 & -1.172 & (0.242) & [-0.105, 0.027] \\ 
  \hline \multicolumn{6}{c}{III. Punitive vs. Monitoring} \\ 
  \underline{A. White vs. Black} &  &  &  &  &  \\ 
  Index measure of favorable in-person interactions  & 0.018 & 0.058 & 0.319 & (0.75) & [-0.095, 0.132] \\ 
  Received post-visit callback  & 0.033 & 0.049 & 0.665 & (0.506) & [-0.064, 0.129] \\ 
  Received post-visit offer for unit  & 0.026 & 0.037 & 0.685 & (0.494) & [-0.048, 0.099] \\ 
  \underline{B. White vs. Hispanic} &  &  &  &  &  \\ 
  Index measure of favorable in-person interactions  & 0.107 & 0.063 & 1.701 & (0.09) & [-0.017, 0.231] \\ 
  Received post-visit callback  & -0.019 & 0.049 & -0.391 & (0.696) & [-0.116, 0.078] \\ 
  Received post-visit offer for unit  & 0.002 & 0.038 & 0.047 & (0.962) & [-0.073, 0.077] \\ 
  \underline{C. Black vs. Hispanic} &  &  &  &  &  \\ 
  Index measure of favorable in-person interactions  & 0.139 & 0.057 & 2.431 & (0.016) & [0.026, 0.251] \\ 
  Received post-visit callback  & -0.052 & 0.047 & -1.11 & (0.268) & [-0.144, 0.04] \\ 
  Received post-visit offer for unit  & -0.024 & 0.036 & -0.667 & (0.505) & [-0.094, 0.046] \\ 
   \hline
\end{tabular}
}
\caption[Estimated Effects of Messaging on Net Discrimination Levels]{Estimated Effects of Messaging on Net Discrimination Levels. Cells contain ITT estimates from OLS models with inverse probability weights and block fixed effects. For each reference group versus comparison group pairing, outcomes are net discrimination measures against the comparison group relative to the reference group. Estimated effects that are positive (negative) are interpreted as increases (decreases) in net discrimination against the comparison group relative to the reference group. Estimated p-values are reported in parentheses; p-values correspond to a one-sided test of the null hypothesis of equality of means for the monitoring-control and punitive-control comparisons, and to a two-sided test of the null hypothesis of equality of means for the punitive-monitoring comparison and for all analyses involving net discrimination against Hispanic (vs. black) testers.}
\label{ittnocov}
\end{table}
